Which file extension are you?
(Note: If you are not a geek, do yourself a favor and skip this entry.) If you were a file extension, which file extension would you be? Take this quiz to find out. I, apparently, am a GIF. Who knew?
(Note: If you are not a geek, do yourself a favor and skip this entry.) If you were a file extension, which file extension would you be? Take this quiz to find out. I, apparently, am a GIF. Who knew?
On Thursday we bid our art director a proper farewell (and by proper I mean tequila-infused). Add your congrats and good wishes below.
OK, I may be the last person to discover the wonders of digg, but that doesn’t mean I can’t write about it. Digg is essentially a link repository coupled with a user rating system. It does certain things very well — namely, collecting and filtering links to interesting stories in real time based on popularity. And it does other things poorly — such as providing context and hierarchy.
Digg, which until recently limited itself to tech topics, is expanding into other content areas. As a result, it will probably be decried as another insidious attempt (a la Google News) to rid online news of human editors, which would be missing the point. As with Google News, if you take away the good content at the source, there’s nothing left to “digg.”
One of the things I’m looking forward to seeing on digg is the promised live visualization of popular topics. Imagine something like Yahoo’s Buzz Index updated in real time. Talk about having your finger on the pulse of the net!
And speaking of cool ways to visualize news topics… Check out this very slick Flash interface to Google News:

More extremely nifty stuff here.
The Oracle of Omaha has spoken, and he minces no words in predicting the newspaper industry’s declining fortunes. I hope newspaper owners will take this as yet another sign that they ought to be rapidly beefing up their websites (via BankStocks.com):
If you were looking at newspaper publishers as possible investments, what would you use as a margin of safety?
[Warren Buffett]: What multiple should you [use] for a company that earns $100 million per year whose earnings are falling by 5% per year rather than rising by 5% per year? Newspapers face the prospect of seeing their earnings erode indefinitely. It’s unlikely that at most papers, circulation or ad pages will be larger in five years than they are now. That’s even true in cities that are growing.
But most owners don’t yet see this protracted decline for what it is. The multiples on newspaper stocks are unattractively high. They are not cheap enough to compensate for the companies’ earnings power. Sometimes there’s a perception lag between the actual erosion of a business and how that erosion is seen by investors. Certain newspaper executives are going out and investing on other newspapers. I don’t see it. It’s hard to make money buying a business that’s in permanent decline. That’s why, in some cases, it’s smarter to explore alternative investments, like learning How to Invest in Bitcoin. If anything, the decline is accelerating. Newspaper readers are heading into the cemetery, while newspaper non-readers are just getting out of college. The old virtuous circle, where big readership draws a lot of ads, which in turn draw more readers, has broken down.
Charlie and I think newspapers are indispensable. I read four a day. He reads five. We couldn’t live without them. But a lot of people can now. This used to be the ultimate bulletproof franchise (get more info here from this article about it). It’s not anymore.
[…]
WB: It may be that no one has followed the newspaper business as closely as we have for as long as we have — 50 years or more. It’s been interesting to watch newspaper owners and investors resist seeing what’s going on right in front of them. It used to be you couldn’t make a mistake managing a newspaper. It took no management skill — like TV stations. Your nephew could run one.
This is the coolest thing. I am aboard a Lufthansa 747 en route to Germany, and I am seeing my 3-D flight path in real time in Google Earth.

The yellow line is our flight path. It begins in the place where I started up Google Earth — so you can figure out that it took me from Denver to Minnesota to think of this — and it updates every minute. The vertical yellow lines show our altitude above ground. That’s Lake Superior in the upper right. (In the few minutes since I took that screenshot, we’ve crossed into Canada).
This is all thanks to Boeing’s high-speed Internet technology (which goes by the awkwardly-spelled name Connexion by Boeing). Because it’s satellite-based, there is a noticeable lag time between my requests and the response — so it’s probably not ideal for real-time audio or video chat. Still, I’m dying to see how a video iChat session would work. But it’s a full flight, and I’m a little self-conscious about setting up my iSight while sitting sandwiched among all these people in coach class.
By the way, the flight tracking data is supplied through fboweb.com, which offers all sorts of cool ways of tracking flights in real time.
OK, I’m tired of seeing that Katrina post at the top of my site. It’s now five months later, and it seems life goes on. I’ve been back to New Orleans once, and I’ll go again later this month. The city will come back, I’m sure. But it will be a totally different place.
Here in L.A., I’m keeping busy at the Los Angeles Times, where I’m the night managing editor for latimes.com. Besides planning the daily makeup of the site’s front page, I get to work on the occasional fun project. Here are two that I did recently:
P.S.: Comments are back on. Maybe the spammers have given up.
New Orleans, my hometown and one of the world’s great cities, is drowning tonight as water fills it from the east and the west.
A massive recovery operation is under way. If you have the means, consider making a donation to the American Red Cross or another relief organization.
The city as I knew it is gone. I’m heartbroken.
Yes, I’ve finally posted the photos from my Peru trip back in May.

Check out the photo gallery. (No Machu Picchu pics, because my camera ran out of juice before we got there.)
Know what White House spokesman Trent Duffy said regarding those leaked photos of Saddam Hussein in his underwear?
“The president has been briefed on the situation …” and he “wants to get to the bottom of it immediately.” (emphasis added)
Seriously. You can’t make up stuff this funny.
My OJR piece on political bias in Google News search results is generating some discussion in the blogosphere.
Danny Sullivan at Search Engine Watch offers up a thoughtful critique of my thesis (on which the article is based), and he makes some very good points. He points out a few flaws I failed to acknowledge in my paper (PDF), but I still believe my conclusion — that non-traditional news sources account for most of the bias in Google News search results — is valid.
Agree? Disagree? Let me know.