<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BusinessWeek Online Archives &#8211; Eric Ulken</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ulken.com/tag/businessweek-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ulken.com/tag/businessweek-online/</link>
	<description>journalism + technology + design + commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How BusinessWeek measures user engagement</title>
		<link>https://www.ulken.com/2009/04/16/how-businessweek-measures-user-engagement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-businessweek-measures-user-engagement</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Ulken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BusinessWeek Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web analytics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ulken.com/?p=446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How do you get past those squishy pageview and unique visitor metrics and instead measure how users actually respond to the content you produce? My interview on this topic with BusinessWeek Online editor John Byrne (whom I met in Perugia at the International Journalism Festival a couple weeks ago) is now up on OJR. An [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ulken.com/2009/04/16/how-businessweek-measures-user-engagement/">How BusinessWeek measures user engagement</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ulken.com">Eric Ulken</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get past those squishy <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_view">pageview</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_visitor">unique visitor</a> metrics and instead measure how users actually <em>respond</em> to the content you produce? My interview on this topic with BusinessWeek Online editor <a href="http://twitter.com/johnabyrne/">John Byrne</a> (whom I met in Perugia at the <a href="http://www.journalismfestival.com/">International Journalism Festival</a> a couple weeks ago) is <a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/eulken/200904/1696/">now up on OJR</a>. An excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Byrne:</strong> User engagement is how we nurture and build a community. Our reader engagement index is a comments-to-postings measure for a given month: So we will tally how many comments on X number of stories/blog posts that BusinessWeek.com published that month. This gives us a ratio figure that we track to determine our monthly reader engagement index and growth.</p></blockquote>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ulken.com/2009/04/16/how-businessweek-measures-user-engagement/">How BusinessWeek measures user engagement</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ulken.com">Eric Ulken</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
