Funky search terms

Like most webmasters, I have a program that keeps track of who’s accessing this site. Of course, it doesn’t name names (lucky you!), but it does give me some interesting general information about where hits are coming from and how people are finding the site.

Anyway, I was just going over a list of the search terms that somehow led people here over the last few months, and I thought I’d share some of the more unusual ones with you:

  • mountains in louisiana – Guess that search didn’t pull in many results. It’s sort of like looking for rainforests in New Mexico.
  • are soccer fans more interested in the visiting team – If you phrase your search as a complete sentence, are you more likely to get a complete answer? No!
  • is there pizza in the musical mamma mia – No, but there’s plenty of cheese.
  • pretending to work – Attention, bosses: This search will not return a list of the “recreational” sites your employees are visiting when they’re supposed to be working on that 150-page budget proposal. Sorry.
  • what is a cutline – Cutline is journalese for caption. (I’m writing this here so the next poor schmoe asking that question will get an answer.)
  • what is a library – Here’s a question more and more young people will be asking as they turn to the Internet for all their research. But I won’t spoil their Googling fun by giving away the answer here.
  • naked people in roman baths – Ohhh-kay…

Listening in on “reality”

So, I’m eavesdropping on a conversation in a restaurant last week (one of the few benefits of dining alone), and I hear two women in intense discussion about how this guy ditched this girl after she told him she once dated FabioI mean, like, was he just overreacting? Is that a legitimate reason to be mad at somebody? And, omigosh, where did she meet Fabio anyway? Etcetera.

Well, I’m thinking, in L.A. it must be pretty common to know somebody who’s dated a celebrity (if Fabio, the heartthrob-turned-margarine pitchman, even qualifies as a celebrity anymore). And I’ve pretty much forgotten the whole conversation when, a couple hours later, I overhear a guy telling his buddy the same story, and a red flag goes up. So I listen further and realize they’re talking about the previous night’s episode of Average Joe: Hawaii, the latest sensation in a long line of mind-numbing reality TV shows.

Curiously, I haven’t overheard any talk about the upcoming presidential election or California’s budget crisis. It’s good to know people have their priorities straight.

A prediction: Pretty soon there will be a reality TV magazine (a la Soap Opera Digest) so folks can read up on all the “important stuff” they missed. If only I had glimpsed such a publication in the checkout line at the grocery store, I might have had some idea of what all these people were talking about.

Update: Looks like my prediction is about two months late. Reality Check, America’s first (and, let’s hope, last) reality-TV magazine, hit newsstands Jan. 13.

One debate, two famous Larrys

I went to the Democratic presidential debate Thursday night at USC. I was one of the few lucky students to get a seat, since I’m in a politics class this semester. Larry King was the moderator. Before the broadcast began he came out to introduce the candidates to the audience. The candidates weren’t quite ready, so Larry stretched by cracking jokes (“Is Kucinich in the bathroom?”) and pretending to be mad at the floor director (“Don’t say ‘one more minute’ or I’ll kill you.”).

Among the students and faculty and Democratic elite (ex-guv Gray Davis, for example) in the audience, I saw another famous Larry: Larry Flynt, in his gold wheelchair. This was particularly funny to me, since I’d just passed the Hustler publisher and recent gubernatorial candidate two days earlier in the hall at Annenberg. Should I be concerned that I am suddenly moving in the same circles as Larry Flynt?

The actual debate went off without incident, and the candidates all got a chance to get in a good line or two. (Al Sharpton on gay marriage: “The issue is not who you go to bed with. The issue is whether you have a job when you get up in the morning.”)

Germans hit the brakes

If you’ve always dreamed of accelerating your Benz to 200 km/h on one of Germany’s autobahns (and doing it legally), you might want to start making your travel plans. Because, from the looks of it, the days of the speed demons’ reign over the road there may be numbered.

My uncle Klaus is no doubt disappointed by this news.

A poll by the German newsmagazine Focus shows that a majority of Germans supports setting a blanket speed limit for drivers on the country’s expressways, where speeds are currently capped only in high-traffic areas. The greatest number of respondents (40%) wants to set the limit at 130 km/h (80 mph). Only 38% oppose any universal speed limit on autobahns, where speeds of over 200 km/h (125 mph) are common. Predictably, more men (50%) than women (26%) are against the speed limit.

My new shopping destinations

In my exploration of the L.A. area, I’ve discovered some great stores that I’ve never seen anywhere else. While they may not be unique to L.A., they are new to me. It’s just too bad they’re not all in the same place.

First, there’s Trader Joe’s, where “affordable, wholesome food” is not an oxymoron. The selection is sparse and the aisles are usually clogged with shoppers, but it’s one of the few places where you can find tasty foods made from natural ingredients — not hydrogenated oils and high-fructose corn syrup.

I also discovered Ikea. Yes, somehow I’d missed this chain of enormous Scandinavian furniture emporiums. I’d even slept on an Ikea bed for three months in Holland, but I hadn’t seen the inside of an Ikea store until a couple weeks ago. Now I have a desk, a dresser and a few other knick-knacks from Ikea. I even sampled the Swedish meatballs at the in-store restaurant. Scary, huh?

And I finally got to visit Fry’s Electronics, a west-coast chain I’d heard great things about for years. What sets Fry’s apart from Best Buy, et al., is how it caters to the geek niche with hardcore stuff like transformers, circuit boards and oscilloscopes. The long check-out corridor is lined with the kinds of goodies that weak-willed impulse buyers like me are apt to pick up — including plenty of snack foods made with corn syrup, hydrogenated oils and all the other dirty chemistry that Trader Joe’s saved me from. But I guess one little bag of gummy apple rings won’t kill me.

Rain, snow, sun: Which would you pick?

Compare these actual recent weather forecasts for my three “homes” and tell me which one looks best. (These are all from Tuesday, Feb. 10, but I am just getting around to posting them.)

Mandeville, La. (where mom lives):

Fly Creek, N.Y. (where dad lives):

Los Angeles, Calif. (where I live):

So, you see, I’m finding there are indeed benefits to being in sunny Southern California!

Originality gap

A quick google on the phrase “credibility gap” yields about 32,000 results in the past three months, most frequently in reference to the president. (To be fair, though, the term is applied to the media in a few instances.)

This reminds me of the epidemic spread of the words “lurid” and “salacious” during the previous president’s intern troubles.

Can’t anybody think of another way to say it? Come to think of it, what does “credibility gap” mean anyway? Credible by what standards? In whose judgment?

The left-turn phenomenon

There’s a funny song called Walking in L.A. — made funnier by the fact that I first heard it on the radio while walking in L.A. One verse goes like this:

Could it be that the smog’s playing tricks on my eyes,
Or is it a rollerskater in some kind of headphone disguise?
Maybe somebody who just ran out of gas,
Making his way back to the pumps the best way he can.
Walkin’ in L.A.
Walkin’ in L.A., nobody walks in L.A.

Nobody but me.

Of course, I do drive, out of necessity. But whenever it’s practical, I walk or take public transit. I get funny looks here when I tell people that. The truth is, L.A. sucks all the fun out of driving. Think about it: You can’t go fast. There’s no such thing as a “wide open road” unless you’re on the Glendale Freeway at 3 in the morning. You sit in traffic the whole way from A to B. And then you have to park.

Yes, there are many things about driving here that raise my ire, and I’m sure I will revisit this topic often. But let me gripe about just one factor today: the curious absense of protected left-turn arrows on traffic signals, even at major intersections. Arrows do exist, but only out in the newer suburbs and at the very busiest junctions in town.

Where there’s no arrow, the accepted procedureĀ is to plant your car in the middle of the intersection and wait until either: a) there’s a gap in the oncoming traffic (which is often wishful thinking here), or b) the light turns yellow, at which point the oncoming traffic (hopefully) stops and the crossing traffic has no choice but to let you turn, since you’re in their way.

Simple enough. But at high-traffic times (which in many places is pretty much always) this leads to the maddening phenomenon that only two cars in a given direction can make a left turn on each cycle of the traffic light. Because two cars is all that will normally fit in the intersection (though occasionally a third car will squeeze through, amid a chorus of horns, after the light’s red).

What this means is, if there are ten cars waiting to turn left, the driver of the tenth car has to sit through five green lights before it’s his turn to turn — by which time he’s forgotten why he wanted to turn in the first place.

The city you can never leave

Nobody’s actually from Los Angeles — or if they are they won’t admit it. So I suppose most people here, like me, have gone through the initial culture shock, denial, bewilderment and occasional delight of settling in Los Angeles.

Variety.com editor Travis Smith recalls a party he attended shortly after his arrival here, at which an attractive woman approached him and asked if he worked in “the industry.” When he replied, as an outsider might, “Which industry?” she did a 180° turn and marched off.

My conversation with Travis reminded me that I had been meaning to document my own experiences from the time I arrived here, about six weeks ago. But so much has happened, between starting school, apartment hunting and looking for a job, that I am only now getting around to it.

Travis, who came from Canada 14 years ago for college and got sucked in, relates living in Los Angeles to that line from the Eagles’ Hotel California: “You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.” “It gets truer the longer I stay here,” he said.

I hear this theme almost every time I talk to a fellow transplant, like Guillermina Molina, who came from North Carolina for grad school and never even escaped USC: She works in admissions now, recruiting more naïve, unsuspecting “guests” to Hotel California.

But why do people stay — despite the sprawl, the traffic, the pollution, and the expense? What keeps them here? I think I’m starting to understand now.

It’s not just the sunshine and the beaches and the mountains, though that doesn’t hurt. It’s also the amazing cultural and ethnic (and culinary!) diversity, which breeds greater tolerance and open-mindedness. It’s that unlikely fusion of laid-back cool and cutting-edge hip. It’s the prevailing belief in progressive government, despite its imperfections, as a vehicle for positive social change. It’s the fact that you can spend a whole evening in a bar and not come out smelling like an ashtray. And it’s the casual optimism people exude — almost as if the gold rush were still on and anyone could hit the motherlode at any time.

To my L.A.-skeptic friends who are reading this from elsewhere in the world, let me set your minds at ease: I have not gone soft, despite that last paragraph. I still have plenty of gripes about this place, and you will get to read some of them here. I’m setting up a new category in my weblog for L.A. stories, and I intend to write about some of my experiences and observations as a newcomer here. I don’t think I’ll run out of material — just time.

Google is life

The Washington Post has a great article on my favorite search engine (now everybody else’s, too, I guess):

There have been many fine Internet search engines over the years … but Google is the first to become a utility, a basic piece of societal infrastructure like the power grid, sewer lines and the Internet itself.

Yes! Google is the first place I go for answers to just about anything, and I’d say 95% of the time I find what I’m looking for. Plus, to keep abreast of the week’s hot topics, I’m particularly fond of Google’s Zeitgeist, which offers a not-quite-realtime snapshot of popular search terms. Yahoo!’s similar Buzz Index is also a fun resource.